:PROPERTIES: :ID: 59f84838-71a9-4aab-a494-8e6bae2080fb :END: #+title: thesis/experiments #+filetags: :project: :knowledge: :experiments: Chapter 4 of the BGU MSc thesis on ROLL. Parent: [[id:6294e2be-6189-4473-b363-a1dd9a75ff9b][thesis]] ** Data Sources - =results-final/keel/= — 12 KEEL datasets × 8 methods × 5 episodes, clean labels - =results-final/keel-noise-05/10/20/= — same 12 datasets × 8 methods × 10 episodes, asymmetric noise - =results-final/cifar10n/= — 3 noise levels (clean/aggre/worse) × 7 methods × 3 episodes; no roll-tpr90 - =results-final/bank-marketing/=, =creditcard/=, =homecredit/= — 5 episodes each, all methods - =results-final/chestxray14/= — 5 episodes × 7 methods (libauc missing due to bug); image dataset ** ChestXray14 Setup (IMPORTANT) - Dataset: NIH ChestX-ray14 (~112K frontal X-rays, 30,805 patients) - Task: Effusion (pleural effusion) vs. rest; IR ~7.5:1, ~12% prevalence - Label noise: ~20% organic — labels from NLP extraction of radiology reports (NOT injected) - Feature extraction: DenseNet-121 pretrained on NIH via TorchXRayVision (=densenet121-res224-nih=) - Frozen; global avg pool of penultimate feature map → 1024-dim embeddings - Script: =scripts/extract_chestxray14_features.py= - Classifier: 1024→512→128→1 MLP with Dropout(0.3) - n=5 episodes; LibAUC excluded (PESG optimizer instability on this task) - Experiment: =experiments/other/experiment-chestxray14.py= ** Key Results *** ChestXray14 (primary new result — real-world organic noise) | Method | AUC | Std | |----------|-------|-------| | roll-aoc | 0.839 | 0.001 | ← BEST, clear win | gce-0.7 | 0.829 | 0.004 | | roll-tpr | 0.828 | 0.002 | | mae | 0.810 | 0.001 | | focal | 0.798 | 0.009 | | bce-w | 0.788 | 0.008 | | asym. | 0.729 | 0.007 | | libauc | --- | | *** KEEL Noise Experiment (primary thesis result) Mean AUC across all 12 KEEL datasets at increasing asymmetric label-noise rates: | Method | 0% | 5% | 10% | 20% | Drop 0→20 | |-----------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-----------| | roll-aoc | 0.880 | 0.871 | 0.862 | 0.847 | −0.033 | | bce-w | 0.872 | 0.869 | 0.862 | 0.843 | −0.029 | | focal | 0.879 | 0.868 | 0.857 | 0.842 | −0.037 | | asym. | 0.892 | 0.872 | 0.870 | 0.833 | −0.059 | | gce-0.7 | 0.886 | 0.870 | 0.865 | 0.831 | −0.056 | | libauc | 0.882 | 0.859 | 0.854 | 0.809 | −0.073 | | mae | 0.875 | 0.878 | 0.866 | 0.804 | −0.071 | | roll-tpr | 0.843 | 0.786 | 0.771 | 0.773 | −0.070 | *ROLL-AOC is best at 20% noise* despite being mid-pack at 0%. GCE/MAE degrade most. *** CIFAR-10N (image noise) | Noise | roll-aoc | gce | mae | libauc | bce | focal | asym | |--------|----------|-------|-------|--------|-------|-------|-------| | clean | 0.980 | 0.976 | 0.976 | 0.979 | 0.977 | 0.977 | 0.972 | | aggre | 0.934 | 0.932 | 0.930 | 0.921 | 0.924 | 0.912 | 0.910 | | worse | 0.821 | 0.774 | 0.809 | 0.752 | 0.738 | 0.734 | 0.720 | *** Large Datasets - Credit Card Fraud: roll-tpr90 best (0.974), roll-aoc close (0.968) - Home Credit: roll-aoc best (0.712), libauc very close (0.711) - Bank Marketing: ROLL FAILS — roll-aoc 0.511, roll-tpr90 0.438; GCE best (0.746). Open question. ** Gotchas - "Label-noise experiment" is NOT a poisoning attack — it's asymmetric noise injection (flip pos→neg) - keel-noise runs use 10 episodes; clean keel uses 5 - libauc-auroc missing 2 episodes for glass2 in clean KEEL (n=58 not 60) - cifar10n has no roll-tpr90 variant; table excludes it - chestxray14 libauc missing entirely — PESG optimizer instability; needs rerun - Bank Marketing failure cause unknown ** Section Structure | Section | Label | Status | |---------|-------|--------| | Datasets (incl. ChestXray14) | sec:experiments:data_sets | Done | | Performance Measures | sec:experiments:performance_measures | Done | | Configurations | sec:experiments:configurations | Done | | KEEL Results | sec:results:keel | Done | | CIFAR-10N Results | sec:results:cifar10n | Done | | Large Datasets Results | sec:results:large | Done | | ChestXray14 Results | sec:results:chestxray14 | Done | | Label-Noise Robustness on KEEL | sec:experiments:noise | Done | | Ablation Study | sec:experiments:ablation | Stub | | Sensitivity Analysis | sec:experiments:sensitivity | Stub | | Summary | sec:experiments:summary | TODO |